究極のガイドはCAMS日本語最新2025年08月02日時間限定！今すぐダウンロード！ [Q348-Q369]

Option B is closest to the definition of money laundering provided by the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime and Other Protocols, which states that money laundering is “the conversion or transfer of property, knowing that such property is the proceeds of crime, for the purpose of concealing or disguising the illicit origin of the property or of helping any person who is involved in the commission of the predicate offence to evade the legal consequences of his or her action”. In this scenario, the person is knowingly financing a resort development with the proceeds of arms trafficking, which is a crime, and thus concealing or disguising the illicit origin of the property.
References: =
CAMS Certification Package – 6th Edition | ACAMS1
CAMS Certifications: How to Get CAMS Certified | ACAMS2
ACAMS CAMS Certification Video Training Course – Exam-Labs3
Exam CAMS: Certified Anti-Money Laundering Specialist (the 6th edition)4 United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime and the Protocols Thereto

Reference: https://egmontgroup.org/en/content/membership

According to the ACAMS CAMS Study Guide (the 6th edition), one of the common methods of money laundering in the insurance sector is to purchase policies with illicit funds, overpay premiums, and then cancel or surrender the policies to receive refunds or payouts1. This allows criminals to move and disguise the source of their funds through the insurance company. Therefore, the regular withdrawals from the policy by the end of the month could indicate a money laundering scheme. Moreover, the FATF Guidance for a Risk-Based Approach for the Life Insurance Sector states that unidentified third parties depositing cash to the policy could also pose a high money laundering risk, as cash transactions are difficult to trace and third parties may act as intermediaries or nominees for the real beneficiaries2. Therefore, the insurance company should conduct enhanced due diligence on the policyholder and the third parties, and monitor the transactions for any suspicious activity.
References:
ACAMS CAMS Study Guide (the 6th edition), Chapter 2: Money Laundering Risks and Methods, page 671 FATF Guidance for a Risk-Based Approach for the Life Insurance Sector, pages 18-192

According to the CAMS study guide, chapter 4, page 1191, transaction records include any records that reflect the movement of funds or assets, such as wire transfers, checks, deposits, withdrawals, securities trades, etc. Therefore, items 1, 2, and 4 are examples of transaction records that should be delivered in response to a legal request. Item 3, signature cards, are not transaction records, but rather account opening documents that contain the customer’s name, address, identification, and signature. These documents may be relevant for customer due diligence or identification purposes, but they do not reflect the transaction activities of the customer.
:
1: ACAMS CAMS Study Guide – 6th Edition, Chapter 4, page 119: https://www.acams.org/wp-content
/uploads/2019/09/ACAMS-CAMS-Study-Guide-6th-Edition-Chapter-4.pdf

A customer who is the brother of a prominent member of a foreign judiciary is considered a politically exposed person (PEP) or a family member of a PEP. PEPs are individuals who hold or have held positions of public trust or influence in a foreign country, such as heads of state, senior politicians, high-ranking military officers, judges, or executives of state-owned enterprises. PEPs pose a higher risk of money laundering, corruption, or bribery due to their access to public funds, influence over policy decisions, or connections to other powerful individuals. Therefore, financial institutions are required to perform enhanced due diligence (EDD) on PEPs and their family members, as well as monitor their transactions and activities more closely.
EDD is a set of additional measures that go beyond the standard customer due diligence (CDD) to obtain more information about the customer, such as their source of wealth, source of funds, expected account activity, business relationships, and reputation. EDD also involves conducting ongoing reviews and updating the customer risk profile regularly. EDD helps the financial institution to mitigate the risks associated with PEPs and detect any signs of money laundering or other illicit activities.
References:
* ACAMS Study Guide1, Chapter 2: Compliance Standards for Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Combating the Financing of Terrorism (CFT), pages 51-52
* FATF Guidance on Politically Exposed Persons2, pages 9-10, 13-14, 17-18
* Wolfsberg Group Guidance on Politically Exposed Persons3, pages 2-3, 6-7

Reviewing parameter settings based on the latest risk assessment should be included in the evaluation of system settings for anti-money laundering alert surveillance. This is because parameter settings determine the thresholds and criteria for generating alerts based on the risk profile of the customers, products, services, channels, and jurisdictions involved in the transactions. A risk assessment is a periodic and comprehensive analysis of the potential money laundering and terrorist financing risks faced by an organization, and it should inform the design and implementation of an effective anti-money laundering program, including the alert surveillance system. By aligning the parameter settings with the risk assessment, an organization can ensure that the system is capturing the most relevant and high-risk transactions, and reducing the number of false positives or irrelevant alerts.
Reference:
CAMS Study Guide 6th Edition, page 37-38.
Implementing AML Transaction Monitoring Systems: Critical Considerations, page 2-3.
3 techniques to improve AML transaction monitoring strategies, page 2.

The customer’s business activity as a domestic carpet cleaning company is not inherently suspicious, as it aligns with their registered business. However, the significant weekly transactions from an international reputable antique auction house raise red flags.
The sudden increase in the customer’s initial international receipt from $15,000 USD to an average of $30,000 USD per transaction per week is also noteworthy. Such a substantial change warrants further scrutiny.
The fact that 90% of the incoming deposits are matched by cash outgoings to non-related individuals could indicate layering or structuring activities associated with money laundering.
Overall, the combination of large international transactions, increased receipts, and cash outflows to unrelated parties from an antique auction house is the most concerning aspect.
Reference:
Anti-Money Laundering Specialist (the 6th edition) resources.
ACAMS AML Glossary (definitions of terms related to AML).1
ACAMS AML Foundations Certificate (overview of AML concepts and responsibilities).2 ComplyAdvantage: 6th Money Laundering Directive (6AMLD) (details on AML regulations and penalties).3

Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD) applies to high-risk customers and transactions, includingpolitically exposed persons (PEPs), high-risk jurisdictions, and correspondent banking relationships.
* Option C (Correct):Correspondent banking relationships with high-risk jurisdictions require EDDto prevent cross-border financial crime.
* Option D (Correct):Ambassadors are considered PEPs, which require EDD due to corruption risks.
* Option E (Correct):A current prime minister is a high-profile PEP, requiringEDD and ongoing transaction monitoring.
Why Other Options Are Incorrect:
* Option A (Incorrect):The individual no longer holds a PEP position and is in a low-risk country, soEDD is not required.
* Option B (Incorrect):A local footballer does not present a high financial crime risk warranting EDD.
EDD Best Practices for High-Risk Customers:
* Verify the source of wealth and funds for PEPs.
* Conduct ongoing transaction monitoring on high-risk accounts.
* Apply stricter controls on correspondent banking with high-risk jurisdictions.
Reference:
FATF Recommendation 10 & 12 (EDD & PEPs)
Basel Committee’s Correspondent Banking Guidelines
Wolfsberg Group Guidance on High-Risk Customers & EDD

MSBs are vulnerable to financial crime due to their cash-intensive nature and remittance services.
Option D (Correct): Hesitation to provide beneficiary details suggests anonymity concerns, a common money laundering tactic.
Option E (Correct): Using multiple accounts under different names is a known structuring technique to evade detection.
Option A (Incorrect): Exchanging foreign currency is normal, though higher-risk transactions require monitoring.
Option B (Incorrect): Cash deposits are expected in MSBs but need additional risk factors to be considered suspicious.
Option C (Incorrect): Frequent small transfers may be normal for remittance businesses.

Reference: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/b/bearerform.asp

According to the Basel guidelines on customer due diligence for banks, a trust is a legal arrangement whereby a person (the settlor or grantor) transfers the legal ownership of specific assets to another person or entity (the trustee) to hold for the benefit of a third person or persons (the beneficiaries)1. The Basel guidelines recommend that banks should identify and verify the identity of the following parties to determine the true nature of the trust relationship:
The trustee, who is the person or entity that has the legal authority and duty to manage the trust assets and distribute them to the beneficiaries according to the trust deed2. The trustee may also be the settlor, the beneficiary, or both, depending on the type and structure of the trust3.
The beneficiaries, who are the persons or entities that have a beneficial interest in the trust assets or income, either presently or in the future4. The beneficiaries may be named individuals, classes of persons, or charitable causes.
The settlor or grantor, who is the person or entity that creates the trust and transfers the legal ownership of the assets to the trustee. The settlor or grantor may also retain some rights or powers over the trust, such as the ability to appoint or remove trustees, beneficiaries, or protectors.
The other three options are incorrect because:
Respondents are not trust parties, but rather financial institutions that maintain correspondent banking relationships with other financial institutions. Respondents are not relevant for the identification of the trust relationship, but rather for the due diligence of the correspondent banking relationship.
Payees are not trust parties, but rather persons or entities that receive payments from the trust or other sources. Payees are not relevant for the identification of the trust relationship, but rather for the monitoring of the transactions and activities of the trust.
Trust administrators are not trust parties, but rather persons or entities that provide administrative services to the trust, such as accounting, record-keeping, or tax compliance. Trust administrators are not relevant for the identification of the trust relationship, but rather for the assessment of the risk and complexity of the trust.
References:
1: Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, Customer due diligence for banks, October 2001, 4, p. 17 2:
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, Customer due diligence for banks, October 2001, 4, p. 17 3:
ACAMS, CAMS Study Guide, 6th Edition, Chapter 5, p. 111 4: Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, Customer due diligence for banks, October 2001, 4, p. 17 : ACAMS, CAMS Study Guide, 6th Edition, Chapter 5, p. 111 : Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, Customer due diligence for banks, October
2001, 4, p. 17 : ACAMS, CAMS Study Guide, 6th Edition, Chapter 5, p. 111 : Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, Customer due diligence for banks, October 2001, 4, p. 10 : ACAMS, CAMS Study Guide, 6th Edition, Chapter 5, p. 112 : ACAMS, CAMS Study Guide, 6th Edition, Chapter 5, p. 112

According to the FATF typology report 2000-20011, lawyers can provide a range of functions that can be useful to a potential money launderer, such as:
Creating complex legal arrangements, such as trusts, foundations, or corporations, that can obscure the identity and ownership of the beneficial owners or the origin and destination of the funds.
Buying and selling property, such as real estate, art, or jewelry, that can be used to transfer or store illicit proceeds or to provide a legitimate cover for the source of funds.
Performing financial transactions on behalf of a client, such as opening bank accounts, transferring funds, issuing checks, or exchanging currencies, that can facilitate the movement or concealment of illicit funds.
Providing legal advice, on the other hand, is not a function that can be directly exploited by a money launderer, unless the advice is related to the above functions or to the avoidance or evasion of anti-money laundering laws and regulations.
References:
1: FATF Terrorist Financing Typologies Report – Financial Action Task Force2

Structured transactions are a common method of money laundering, where large amounts of cash are broken down into smaller deposits or withdrawals to avoid reporting thresholds or detection. The most effective tool to detect such transactions is a software program that can link apparently unrelated transactions by using various criteria, such as customer name, address, account number, identification number, transaction amount, date, time, location, etc. Such a program can help identify patterns, trends, and anomalies that may indicate money laundering activity.
Reference:
ACAMS CAMS Certification Study Guide1, Chapter 2: Money Laundering Risks and Methods, Section 2.2: Common Money Laundering Methods, pp. 51-52 ACAMS CAMS Certification Video Training Course2, Module 2: Money Laundering Risks and Methods, Lesson 2.2: Common Money Laundering Methods ACAMS CAMS Certification Exam Outline3, Domain 2: Compliance Standards for Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Combating the Financing of Terrorism (CFT), Task 2.2: Implement risk-based CDD, EDD and ongoing due diligence policies, procedures and processes, p. 13

Explanation
A financial institution should regularly update its AML risk assessment in order to ensure that the results of the assessment are accurate and reflect the current money laundering and other illicit financial activity risks that the institution may face. This helps to ensure the institution has a comprehensive understanding of the risks associated with its activities and can implement adequate controls and procedures as necessary.

Explanation
Using cash to buy multiple cashier’s checks over a period of time is considered suspicious activity of money laundering. This method is commonly known as structuring, where individuals or entities use cash to buy multiple monetary instruments such as cashier’s checks in small amounts, to avoid reporting requirements.
This behavior could be an attempt to evade transaction monitoring and reporting requirements by a financial institution. Additionally, the fact that the account also receives multiple electronic transfers for the same amount could be a red flag for money laundering as it is a common technique used to layer or disguise the origin of illicit funds.
Reference: Certified Anti-Money Laundering Specialist (the 6th edition) Study Guide, page 100-101.

A Penza scheme, also known as a Ponzi scheme, is a form of fraud that lures investors and pays profits to earlier investors with funds from more recent investors1 The scheme relies on attracting new investors with unrealistic promises of high returns and low risk, while using their money to pay off the previous investors2 An unlicensed investment advisor who offers profits other investments cannot guarantee is likely to be involved in a Penza scheme, as this is a common way to entice unsuspecting victims3 The other options are not necessarily indicative of a Penza scheme, as they could be legitimate or involve other types of fraud.
References: 1 Ponzi scheme – Wikipedia; 2 Ponzi Schemes: Definition, Examples, and Origins – Investopedia; 3 What is Ponzi Scheme? – Sanction Scanner

Reference: https://www.acams.org/en/resources/aml-glossary-of-terms